Skip to main content
Skip to the site menu

Agentz · Vision

Your memory. Your tools. Your continuity.

Your intelligence, memory and tools remain with you as your work evolves.

Agentz · Your Cloud Computer

Mission

Provide your continuing Cloud Computer: coordinate specialist work, retain accepted memory in Cortex and disclose scoped context through Nexus.

One of Skyzai’s seven product strategies, designed to contribute to outcomes for Me (individuals), We (organisations) and They (machine intelligence).

Rosetta agent row · Axiology

What matters, to whom, under which consequences, at whose cost?

Agentz connects your priorities and constraints to specialist work, reviewable plans and the continuing memory of a case.

Objectives

  1. Resume the right case with its reasons and sources.
  2. Give each specialist only the context its work needs.
  3. Keep accepted memory recoverable and proposals within your scope.

Strategy

Match each bounded task to an eligible model, configuration, inference provider and infrastructure. Coordinate specialists and independent reviews around Cortex memory, Nexus grants, device continuity and inspectable usage; qualify fallback before replacement.

Specialist work

Match bounded work to an eligible model, configuration, inference provider and infrastructure; compare the attributed results.

Cortex memory

Retain accepted knowledge with its sources, corrections and recovery needs.

Nexus connections

Connect permitted context across products, people and devices.

KPIs

Proposed measures of progress

Measure useful outcomes, recovery and export fidelity, permission leaks, replica failures, stale context, full interaction latency and correction-inclusive cost.

These measures describe how to evaluate this product’s contribution. Each needs a defined scope, observation period and evidence.

Targets
Not set. Thresholds remain to be agreed for the proposed measures.
Performance observations
No measured results are recorded here for these proposed measures.
Agentz measurement definitions

Proposed definitions. Period: the next declared acceptance cycle, with its start/end and selected account/case population recorded before measurement. Performance observation: Not recorded. Target: Unset. Actual accountable assignees and service evidence remain to be supplied.

Resume fidelity

Eligible population
All requested resumes of an existing case in the declared acceptance cycle, including blocked and unresolved attempts; exclude new-case creation.
Calculation
Resumptions with the correct accepted versions, pinned commitments and permitted context / all requested resumes of existing cases. Report blocked and unresolved counts separately.
Source and accountable role
Versioned case and disclosure review, compared with the prior checkpoint. Work coordinator and independent reviewer.
Limit
A local fixture cannot measure cross-device or live-provider reliability.

Replacement qualification

Eligible population
All proposed worker/model/configuration/provider replacements in the cycle.
Calculation
Resumptions passing every required capability, privacy, licence, runtime, budget, deadline and grant check / all replacement proposals. Record rejection reasons separately.
Source and accountable role
Route qualification record, grant snapshot and resulting task lineage. Routing specialist.
Limit
An illustrative compatibility flag is not a real provider certification.

Context isolation

Eligible population
All disclosure attempts for the selected accounts and purposes during the cycle.
Calculation
Count actual out-of-scope disclosures, with number of attempted disclosures as denominator; count prevented attempts separately. Test fresh, expired and revoked grants.
Source and accountable role
Independent comparison of permitted views with delivered records, including separate-account negative controls. Context curator.
Limit
Revocation prevents future access; it cannot recall copies already received.

Recovery and export fidelity

Eligible population
All accepted records and required provenance selected for each declared restore/export exercise.
Calculation
Records restored or exported with correct content, versions, acceptance and provenance / records required. Report missing keys, replica failures and unresolved recovery separately.
Source and accountable role
Independent destination comparison and restore logs; encrypted replicas need their own proof. Memory steward.
Limit
Not demonstrated by this website; resetting the example is not recovery.

Useful completion

Eligible population
All eligible bounded work cases opened in the cycle.
Calculation
Independently accepted useful outcomes / eligible cases. Show declined, interrupted, abstained and unresolved cases alongside that rate.
Source and accountable role
Named reviewer decisions against the pinned acceptance criteria and independently sourced outcome evidence. Independent reviewer.
Limit
A generated answer or execution log cannot approve its own result.

Continuing-work cost and latency

Eligible population
Every admitted attempt for the selected cases, including retries, replacements and corrections.
Calculation
Sum compute, storage and interaction costs in a declared currency per case; report unknown charges separately. Record end-to-end elapsed time from admitted start to disposition with pauses explicit.
Source and accountable role
Attributed usage and billing records, timestamps and reconciliation; quote, ceiling, usage and payment remain distinct. Usage reviewer.
Limit
Unknown is not zero. Synthetic usage is not a live price, bill or payment receipt.

Launch evidence

Dated measurements of product launches, live integrations and published customer outcomes have not been recorded here. Missing evidence is not a measured zero.

Released services
Not recorded
Live product integrations
Not recorded
Published customer outcomes
Not recorded

Historical declaration · . Owner direction, 18 October 2026. An owner-specified zero-release baseline was recorded for planning. It is retained as source history and is not a measured product result.

Agents

The Rosetta agent row connects this product’s field of inquiry to occupations, skills and responsibilities. The occupations below describe specialist work; different people, models and tools may carry these capabilities within an explicit assignment.

Rosetta agent row. Product L4 · Axiology

Responsibility. Reviewable plans and unsigned proposals

Reasoning approach. Abductive planning: propose a plausible way forward, compare alternatives and examine whose needs, costs and consequences each proposal serves.

Work coordinator

Skills and responsibilities. Qualifies task routes and replacements within privacy, budget and deadline limits; brings results together for independent review.

Memory steward

Skills and responsibilities. Maintains provenance and revisions, with portable export and redundant storage as delivery targets.

Context curator

Skills and responsibilities. Scopes each view by purpose, access and expiry, without granting permission to spend or act.

Specialist agents bring domain knowledge, evidence evaluation, planning, memory lifecycle, secure systems, privacy and recovery skills; appointments and operating competence need evidence.

Specialist inputs, skills, outputs and limits

Work coordinator and routing specialist

Inputs
Objective, permitted context, task criteria, model/provider capabilities and parent budget/deadline.
Skills
Decompose work; compare model versions, configurations and inference infrastructure; check compatibility and permitted fallback.
Output
Attributed bounded assignments, route qualification gaps and an unsigned synthesis for review.
Limits
Cannot widen a grant, appoint an unqualified provider, change a commitment or approve spending.

Memory steward

Inputs
Accepted source records, revisions, provenance and explicit retention/export terms.
Skills
Keep candidates separate from accepted memory; trace correction, export and restoration fidelity.
Output
Versioned lineage and a separately reviewed candidate revision or recovery report.
Limits
Cannot silently accept a summary, promise unavailable keys or infer recovery from encrypted copies.

Context curator

Inputs
Account, consumer, source boundary, purpose, grant, expiry, retention and current revocation state.
Skills
Construct the minimum permitted view; recheck access at delivery and reconnect.
Output
A scoped context view or an explicit refusal with a reason.
Limits
Private context is not ambient; reading permission conveys no action or payment permission.

Independent reviewer

Inputs
Pinned acceptance criteria, attributed results, sources, dissent and correction history.
Skills
Challenge unsupported claims and compare outcomes with the original commitment.
Output
Acceptance, rejection or unresolved findings with provenance.
Limits
The worker cannot approve its own result; a website role is not a staffed appointment.

Usage reviewer

Inputs
Budget, attributed attempts, incomplete usage, billing terms and known obligations.
Skills
Reconcile interruption, retry and correction costs; expose unknown charges.
Output
A reviewable cost record and discrepancies, separate from payment.
Limits
Does not execute a payment or erase incurred work because a proposal was declined.

These are roles and skills in development, with a defined context and an output to inspect. Their performance needs evidence and evaluation; a role description does not give an agent permission to act.

See it in a piece of work.

Local interactive example · commissioning an analysis

Continue the work when the worker changes.

A team compares two methods for an independent analysis. The original worker stops partway through. Explore how Agentz could select a compatible replacement while Cortex retains accepted records and Nexus limits the next disclosure.

Fictional records and qualification checks. Nothing is sent, stored persistently or decrypted; no model runs and no money moves. Reload resets the case. This is separate from the workshop procurement example.

Pinned commitment

Analysis agreement · version 1

Compare the two analysis methods using the shared brief and public sources.

USD 40 for the analysis; no purchase or payment permission

A named team reviewer checks scope, source attribution and unresolved questions.

Cortex · accepted memory

Team brief v1 · accepted public source v1

Source v1: “Method A uses public material.”

Accepted source revision is current in this example. A correction creates no interview permission.

Proposal: none. Delivery and acceptance unresolved.

Nexus · next permitted view

Grant analysis-context-v1 · active

Purpose: compare the analysis methods.

  • team-brief-v1
  • public-method-account-v1

Private personnel records remain excluded. Use for this assignment; no provider retention or training permitted. End of this fictional assignment; expiry can be simulated below.

Task, model, configuration and provider
Current worker/provider
Original worker · Provider A
Model/version
Example analysis model · version 1
Configuration
Read-only sources; no tools that send, purchase or pay
Stop condition
Return an attributed comparison or report insufficient evidence; no sending, purchasing or paying.
Qualification
Original fictional assignment. These are illustrative fixtures, not tested real providers.
Usage
USD 0.12 simulated prior usage; remaining usage unknown. Interruption, refusal and replacement do not erase prior usage or authorise payment. The analysis ceiling remains USD 40.

The original worker has a permitted brief and source revision 1. No result has been accepted.

Inspect the local history (0)

    Replacing a worker preserves the purpose, accepted versions, agreement and resource obligations. It adds no grant. Storage encryption, independent replicas, export and actual cross-device recovery each require separate implementation and measured evidence.

    Inspect memory and disclosure responsibilities · Me · We · They

    One job, with clear boundaries.

    Starts with
    Your intentions, permitted evidence and forecasts, accepted memory, budgets and scope.
    Produces
    Attributed specialist results, reviewable proposals and continuing case memory, with acceptance, sources and revisions preserved.

    Agentz does not sign or acquire authority through integration. Keys are intended to remain under your control; context grants, work mandates and payment authorisation are separate. Redundant storage and private cloud computation are implementation targets.

    Cortex, Nexus and your continuing case

    Agentz sits at the centre of APU and MurMur, Circle and LIQUID, Reality Futures and Menexus. The Atman metaphor describes continuity throughout Skyzai; it makes no claim of consciousness or authority.

    Cortex · memory and redundant storage

    Preserve the records you accept, with their sources and revisions. Redundant encrypted copies, independent recovery and portable export are targets that need measured proof.

    Explore Cortex memory

    Nexus · connections and permissions

    Connect only the context each task may use. Purpose, expiry and revocation remain explicit; a connection does not grant permission to act or spend.

    APU · your interface

    Speak, type and navigate through APU. Its voice and text interface presents the context Nexus permits; useful accepted memory continues in Cortex.

    Your computer goes with you

    Agentz is designed to route each bounded task to an eligible model, model configuration, inference provider and infrastructure. A replacement needs compatible task performance, source format, privacy, licensing, budget and deadline. The local example demonstrates the decision boundaries; it connects no provider.

    APU is the interface through phones, internet-connected earbuds and other devices. Open encrypted neo-cloud infrastructure, high bandwidth, low latency and digital-currency payments are design targets. They are not established by this website.

    Your stored memory is intended to use keys under your control. Private cloud AI also requires verified execution and scoped key release: storage encryption alone does not protect plaintext during ordinary inference.

    Capabilities and current proof.

    As reviewed on , these are selected capabilities traced to their product owner. The proof level describes a plan, source observation or bounded test; it does not establish a released service.

    • Continuing case work and memory boundary · Source observed

      Case code binds work, feedback and retained state across product contributions.

      Current limit: Local case storage and generated drafts are not the intended durable redundant Agentz memory.

    • Bounded local review and learning · Bounded local proof

      Device brief and local bounded review/feedback loop passed documented local checks.

      Current limit: Device work and synthetic provider checks do not prove autonomous multi-agent service or live model inference.

    • Authenticated case synchronization · Hosted source; release unaccepted

      Flutter outbox/CAS and Firebase callable/Firestore source have local emulator and unit evidence.

      Current limit: No production deployment or two signed-in device acceptance was established.

    • Cortex memory and retrieval within Agentz · Source observed

      The owner puts Cortex within Agentz; dated source and a separate proof package show bounded text/retrieval interfaces.

      Current limit: Historical Cortex product labels and a text package do not establish production memory or search.

    • Bounded text lifecycle · Bounded local proof

      A dependency-free Dart package and two synthetic Flutter hosts exercise deterministic routing and text lifecycle.

      Current limit: No real model, provider quota, production extraction or independent-team adoption is proven.

    • Encrypted redundant memory · Proposed

      User-controlled encrypted replicas and exact restore are owner-directed Cloud Computer requirements.

      Current limit: No replica count, recovery, failover, confidential inference or key recovery is implemented by the local receipt carrier.

    • Purpose-scoped connections · Source observed

      Existing Connect repositories and consent UI form source candidates for Nexus connection work.

      Current limit: A renamed ownership boundary does not prove independently admitted Nexus grants or cross-product consent.

    • Specialist work and model routing · Bounded local proof

      The local host uses one bounded Agentz review step; a separate package demonstrates synthetic deterministic model routing.

      Current limit: This does not establish many-agent orchestration, live model service, independent consensus or global budget enforcement.

    • Attested cloud workers and usage · Proposed

      Cloud Computer plan specifies isolated execution, attestation, latency and metered usage.

      Current limit: No worker measurement, task-key release, mobile latency profile or currency settlement is implemented.

    Inspect the full capability record and source references

    Product plan, responsibilities and sources

    Direction and delivery

    Skyzai’s vision is an emergent Marketsphere. Its mission is to develop SPECTRE as an open operating system for it. Me, We and They describe the participant objectives, and each of the seven products is a strategy with its own KPIs and Agents. This nested product plan explains its direction, objectives, delivery work, measures and responsibilities; customer outcomes remain to be demonstrated.

    Vision
    Your intelligence, memory and tools remain with you across devices and products, under your control.
    Mission
    Provide your continuing Cloud Computer: coordinate specialist work, retain accepted memory in Cortex and disclose scoped context through Nexus.
    Objectives
    Resume the correct case, preserve sources and disagreement, recover accepted memory and keep every agent within admitted scope, budget and authority.
    Strategies
    Match each bounded task to an eligible model, configuration, inference provider and infrastructure. Coordinate specialists and independent reviews around Cortex memory, Nexus grants, device continuity and inspectable usage; qualify fallback before replacement.
    Measures & triggers
    Measure useful outcomes, recovery and export fidelity, permission leaks, replica failures, stale context, full interaction latency and correction-inclusive cost.
    Agents & skills
    Specialist agents bring domain knowledge, evidence evaluation, planning, memory lifecycle, secure systems, privacy and recovery skills; appointments and operating competence need evidence.
    Plan basis and open decisions

    Current owner direction defines product responsibilities. Retained proposals inform delivery plans and engineering work. Signed charters, current operating mandates, staffing and measured baselines retain their separate standing.

    • Prove a complete case journey across devices, specialists and recovery paths before claiming a connected personal cloud.
    • Open encrypted infrastructure, user-controlled keys, measured low latency, independent replicas and digital-currency payments are targets, not operating services.

    These working documents require access to the corresponding private GitHub repositories.

    Rosetta agent row.

    Selected product correspondence. Agentz retains the L4 product home and unsigned-proposal function while housing Cortex, Nexus and the intended redundant memory capability. The Atman metaphor describes continuity across Skyzai; it is not a claim of consciousness or authority.

    Product L4 · Axiology
    Reviewable plans and unsigned proposals

    What matters, to whom, under which consequences, at whose cost? Agentz connects your priorities and constraints to specialist work, reviewable plans and the continuing memory of a case.

    How the Rosetta agent row is used

    Skyzai presents seven products: APU, Circle, ReFu, Agentz, Menexus, LIQUID and MurMur. Agentz is the continuing centre, with Cortex memory and Nexus connections. APU is the interface. Menexus means ensurance, insurance and assurance. Product roles preserve the underlying Rosetta coordinates. Emergentism is the framework across the whole. The Spectre network is a component within the wider Marketsphere programme; Permanent Composability supports independent reuse across the products.

    The Rosetta agent row relates this product’s inquiry, reasoning and specialist skills to Emergentism. Several models, people or tools may contribute to the work. The philosophical correspondence, product responsibility and agent dispatch contract remain distinct; this page neither establishes deployed performance nor grants a model permission to act. This product direction does not migrate runtime contracts or amend signed source history.

    Explore the design.

    Connected capabilities in this website home. These are designs with distinct service responsibilities.

    These pages describe the intended product and its delivery work. They do not open a signed-in app or establish operating availability.

    How the products work together Identity & artwork

    Back to the app family

    Earlier artwork bookmarks

    Context: Agentz.

    Skyzai, close at hand.

    Keep this website on your home screen and read saved pages offline. The connected app at skyzai.com is still in development.

    On iPhone or iPad, open this site in Safari, choose Share → Add to Home Screen, then Open as Web App if offered. On Android or desktop, use your browser’s Install app or Add to Home screen menu when available.

    Offline reading & privacy

    Offline reading becomes available after the initial download. External sites are not saved. Your browser may evict saved pages.

    Conversations and drafts are never saved by the offline cache. Reloading clears them. To remove downloaded pages, clear this website’s data in browser settings; uninstalling alone may not clear it.