Create the story. Share in the sale.

The intended API gives people and AI agents access to permitted product knowledge and assets: exact configurations, parts, specifications and approved imagery or geometry. Use a preferred model to create a demonstration, comparison, explainer, post or video for the audience you serve.

The maker’s published rights define what can be reused. Keep claims tied to the correct revision and their sources; generated content must not invent test results, features or availability. Private CAD, customer data and device history need their own permissions.

Publish on permitted channels with a unique product link or tag and a visible affiliate disclosure. Influencers, specialist creators and agents can participate in the same campaign model. Marketing brings the customer to an offer; the order book handles the proposed sale.

A tag may travel through chat, product pages, social posts, creator tools or a service recommendation. It is an attribution input, not a payment instruction, independent quality signal or proof of a sale.

When an order is accepted, it should preserve the offer, campaign, policy and accepted chain versions. Later edits must not rewrite that history. Invalid bindings or unresolved attribution conflicts block allocation under the proposed design.

The direction is to reward a marketer for bringing a new customer, including eligible later purchases when that customer returns. The campaign records the acquisition attribution and the terms under which recurring commissions apply.

Customer acquisition and downline membership are separate. Buying through a link does not enrol the customer as a marketer. Inviting another marketer creates a relationship only when they accept; their qualifying sales can share the campaign pool with eligible upstream participants.

Each return purchase must qualify under defined product and seller scope, attribution duration, privacy permissions, competing-referral rules and return conditions. These operating terms remain to be selected; no lifetime or universal commission entitlement is established.

Acquisition rewards, a later direct referral and upstream allocations must fit within the same funded pool for that sale. Their precedence needs an explicit policy. Recruitment alone earns nothing, and this website does not track customers or pay commissions.

A campaign defines the seller-funded pool. A retained eligible sale qualifies for allocation under those terms; it does not retroactively invent the campaign’s funding or rate.

If the customer returns the product

Keep the original order and attribution. Record the return against that sale and reassess eligibility under its pinned policy. A cancelled or fully returned purchase cannot keep qualifying as a retained sale. Correct an unpaid allocation before payout; if money has already been paid, the campaign needs an agreed recovery or reserve rule. A return record alone does not prove the money was recovered.

Refunds, partial returns, disputes, fraud and duplicate events need reversal, reserve and reconciliation rules. Allocation eligibility is not proof of payout. The website tracks no referrals and holds no reward pool.

One existing proposal gives the direct eligible referrer 61.8% of a funded referral pool. The remaining 38.2% continues upstream: each eligible referrer receives 61.8% of what remains. When the accepted chain ends, the residual returns to the Marketing & Sales budget.

This splits the seller-funded commission pool. The campaign separately defines its eligible sale base and funding rate. Tags preserve the campaign and accepted chain; a qualifying retained sale creates the proposed allocation event. Recruitment alone earns nothing.

This recursive split is an existing candidate, not an adopted default. It does not decide precedence between acquisition rewards, a later direct referral and upstream claims. Those claims must fit within one funded pool. Adoption, eligibility, depth, precision, rounding, reversals and payout rules need a reconciled policy before real allocations.

Expected commission = q × r × P × s

q is the assumed chance of a qualifying retained purchase; r the commission fraction; P the eligible sale base; s the recipient’s share of the pool. Here P means product sale base, not the provider-delivery cost symbol on the API page.

Equal percentages remove a difference in nominal commission rates. They do not remove price bias. A more expensive product can produce greater expected commission even with a lower purchase probability. Needing the sale does not prove a buyer-beneficial equilibrium price or neutral recommendation.

These are proposed controls to evaluate, not proof of neutral behaviour. A claim that paid promotion never affects matching or ranking requires an adopted selection policy and observable evidence.

A Super Nudge would be clearly labelled paid promotion. The owner also questioned whether this model fits the intended incentive system. It remains optional and unresolved; no campaign type or paid-placement policy is launched here.

A label explains a commercial connection. It does not by itself explain how payment changes selection, ranking, repetition or timing. Before adopting it, decide whether promotion is separate from suitability recommendations, which influence is permitted and how buyers can inspect it.

Disclosure design reference: the U.S. FTC’s endorsement guidance. This is a jurisdiction-specific reference, not a claim of compliance or approval.

Retained eligible sale, attribution, finite-pool allocation and authorised payout require separate records. A declined purchase or replayed sale creates no additional commission.