B5 -- Telegram Interface: Organs and Models
Status: pre-launch. This page describes target design; this document does not establish a deployed service.
You talk to organs, not models. The plumbing is invisible.
Two Layers
The Telegram interface has two distinct layers that users must never confuse:
Layer 1: Organs (Visible)
These are your contacts. They appear in your chat list like people:
| Contact | Organ | Stage | What It Says |
|---|---|---|---|
| Circle | TheCircle (F1) | IS | "Three sources confirm the event." |
| ReFu | RealityFutures (F2) | COULD | "Market prices this at 73%." |
| Agentz | Agentz (F3) | SHOULD | "Compiler stages HOLD for review." |
Additional product contacts (not pipeline organs, but visible in the interface):
| Contact | Product | What It Says |
|---|---|---|
| Menexus | Menexus (operations) | "Your Q3 operating report is ready." |
| Helios | Helios (hardware) | "New spatial clip signed." |
When Circle messages you, it says: "Circle says: Three sources confirm..." It never says "GPT-4o says..." or "Claude says..." The organ speaks. The model is plumbing.
Layer 2: Models (Invisible Infrastructure)
Behind every organ message, one or more models did the work:
| Provider | Models | Used By |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | GPT-4o, o3 | Circle analysis, Agentz review |
| Anthropic | Claude Opus, Sonnet | Agentz review, Cortex |
| Gemini 2.5 | Circle multimodal | |
| BitNet | SmallEBM (local, 10MB) | SPECTRE edge nodes |
Default routing may select models within permitted provider, privacy, quality, deadline and cost constraints. Organ identity and model-provider choice remain distinct; the dated provider catalogue is an illustration, not current availability.
Group Chat = Council Deliberation
When you create a Telegram group with Circle + ReFu + Agentz, you get an advisory review session. It is not a board meeting, authorization ceremony, or execution surface:
You: "Should I increase my SOL position?"
Circle: "On-chain: whale accumulation. Social: mixed. Score: 6.2/10."
ReFu: "Market prices SOL > $200 by Q3 at 41%. Edge: thin."
Agentz: "Review: Intelligence sees signal. Strategy says edge < threshold.
Legal: no K-invariant conflict. Treasury: within sector limit.
RECOMMENDATION: HOLD. Insufficient edge for new entry."
Each organ speaks from its function. Circle observes (IS). ReFu prices (COULD). Agentz recommends (SHOULD). Under applicable law, a private Natural Person decides their own exact act; public-DAV consequence requires a complete valid bound PRISM decision receipt from the signer(s) required by applicable law, the entity's governing instrument, or a valid competent mandate binding the exact consequence. PRISM records and verifies only. The group chat makes the pipeline tangible but never becomes a signer.
Why This Matters
-
Model-agnostic by design. If OpenAI doubles prices, swap the model. Circle still speaks as Circle. No user-facing change.
-
Trust is organ-level. You trust Circle's track record (EigenTrust, Watchman Score), not GPT-4o's benchmarks. The organ accumulates reputation. The model is replaceable.
-
Every new model can make organs smarter. When a better model ships, Circle upgrades invisibly. The organ layer is the coordinator; it gets better with every model generation after adapter, evaluation, and receipt gates prove the upgrade.
-
Constitutional constraints live at the organ and authority membranes. Agentz can reject an invalid proposal, but only external lawful authority can authorize a consequence. The model and review panel remain advisory.
The Invisible Seam
Users see organs. Developers see models. The Telegram layer is the membrane between biological metaphor and silicon reality. The metaphor is not decoration -- it is the API contract.
Model Routing & Policy Layer
“Telegram for models” requires explicit routing policy and accountability.
Per-request policy fields
- Model class/capability requirement
- Data sensitivity class
- Latency budget
- Cost ceiling
- Allowed providers/jurisdictions
Execution guarantees
- Route decision recorded with reason code
- Fallback path on model failure/timeouts
- Output provenance metadata returned to caller
Governance warning
Routing without policy turns into hidden centralization. Keep decisions inspectable and overrideable.
Historical predecessor wording — retained on 2026-09-27, not active rules
The displaced passages are preserved verbatim for lineage. This retention date is not their original authorship date.
Predecessor passage 1
The user never selects a model. The organ's agent chain selects the right model for the right task. Circle might use Gemini for image analysis and Claude for synthesis -- the user sees only Circle's output.