Skyzai Markets
Explore how supported access to a manufacturer’s machine could work for a defined place, purpose and period. Compare access, purchase and delivered-work options from handover to return.
Version, configuration, buyer use, region and period.
Named obligations, price/payer, support and remedy.
Record the agreement and the work actually delivered.
Compare the promised obligation with its observed outcome.
The initial direction is rental-first embodied AI, especially humanoid robots. A short deployment and a continuing service contract are both possible; neither must be a monthly subscription. Outright purchase and separately chosen support remain alternatives.
In this model, manufacturers would issue offers for their own products and identify any appointed delivery or service partners. Skyzai would help structure product knowledge, comparable terms and service records. It would not buy or finance the fleet, underwrite insurance or guarantee a manufacturer’s performance. A service label is not cover or proof of delivery.
Identify the exact product, service scope, accountable maker and any fulfilment or service partner. A partner does not remove the maker’s accepted obligations. Only verified makers would list products; retailers cannot list resale offers.
Ownership with separately chosen lifecycle support, or access/usage with integrated commitments, are possible forms. Availability does not enrol a buyer in a subscription. Payer, term, inclusion and cost must be explicit.
This proposed standard preserves the digital usage model. It does not turn a model response into a guaranteed outcome or require hardware-upgrade rights for consumed energy. Menexus retains its own separate programmes and contracts.
| Record or decision | What it needs to say |
|---|---|
| Product link | Exact product, version/configuration, offer and accepted agreement/version; covered transaction or usage. |
| Responsible parties | Direct manufacturer, contractual seller, actual asset owner and any maker-appointed delivery, maintenance or remedy partner. |
| Scope and unit | Promised obligations, how measured, capacity, exclusions and supporting evidence. |
| Context and time | Task and site suitability, location, exact start/end dates, supported configuration, capacity, renewal and withdrawal. |
| Price and payer | Full period price, delivery/setup/return transport, included support, taxes, any refundable deposit and separately authorised cloud usage. |
| Handover and return | Agreed configuration and condition, training/setup, permitted use, return location, inspection and treatment of damage. |
| Remedy and exit | Downtime, missed support, safe return, cancellation, refund, data export and what remains owed. |
Agreement validity and delivered performance are different facts. A website fixture cannot establish a contract, coverage, insurance, capacity or maker acceptance.
Reserved capacity, operating hours and accepted tasks are different units. The offer must identify which one is billed and how it is evidenced. Rental access does not itself promise a number of completed tasks. Transport, setup, maintenance and turnaround constrain availability for the next customer.
For an illustrative continuing service, pin a period, capacity or usage unit, named provider and price ceiling. Record what was delivered in that period and which obligations remain unresolved. Renewal needs an explicit choice or a valid, bounded standing agreement with clear cancellation terms. A successful prior period alone does not authorise another charge.
An included maintenance or upgrade promise has a scope and responsible party. Insurance stays unspecified unless actual cover and eligibility are separately established. Partial service, interruption, overages and exit need agreed billing, credit and remedy terms.
A marketplace fee may apply to an eligible completed rental or fulfilled service period only under its agreed terms. Deposits and a future renewal are not completed service. Reconcile cancellations, disputed periods, credits and refunds before recognising the retained fee base; rates remain undecided.
For a robot repair booking, agree the exact unit, service scope, location, available appointment and any required parts before confirming. If no slot or compatible part is available, keep the booking unconfirmed and show alternatives. A customer cancellation follows the accepted cancellation and refund terms; a disputed repair keeps its remedy open instead of being counted as completed work.
Compare service, XaaS and bundle terms · Try partial and unresolved acceptance
A proposed customer review would link the product/order and accepted agreement version to a specific promised obligation, due date, observed outcome and supporting evidence. “Was the repair completed when agreed?” is a different question from general satisfaction.
| Record or decision | What it needs to say |
|---|---|
| Promise and outcome | Which obligation was accepted, when it was due, and what the customer observed. |
| Evidence and verification | Relevant records and the limits of what the platform checked; no invented score or verification badge. |
| Response and correction | Maker response, corrections, dispute status and a contest path that retains the history. |
Review eligibility, privacy, anti-manipulation rules, aggregation and appeal remain to be designed. Reviews would inform comparison; they do not certify engineering safety, guarantee service or adjudicate a legal dispute.
Fictional XAAS-LA-02, version 1.0-demo, names actuator LA-02 in workshop region R-01. Change the intended sale to see why a badge alone is insufficient.
A later service change must preserve the original order and its accepted obligations. Replacement terms need their own review; history is not rewritten.
This synthetic scope-matching exercise illustrates one possible admission candidate. It does not adopt a mandatory rule or qualify an actual maker. A valid-looking record is insufficient without the responsible parties’ agreement and evidence.
Changed or withdrawn terms affect future offers. Existing accepted obligations, correction history and remedies remain recorded; a successor agreement cannot rewrite a past order.
The product twin carries the links, and the order proposal pins the versions for review. Similar appearance does not establish the same coverage.
The ambition is end-to-end automated customer service. The product twin and permitted records in Cortex could connect configuration, manuals, orders, diagnostics and service history, helping customers and their agents without rebuilding the context each time.
The intended service would answer questions, check delivery, investigate faults, book service, arrange an eligible replacement and coordinate agreed hardware or software upgrades. It would keep the case connected until the result is verified and the twin’s history is updated.
Automation follows the provider’s actual agreement and permissions. Missing evidence, physical inspection, disputed remedies or an action outside those permissions require the responsible provider’s involvement. A confident answer does not establish a diagnosis, insurance cover or a completed repair.
Where an event meets the OFN receipt standard, its financial record can support bookkeeping, accounting and controlling. The illustrated workflow creates no OFN receipts or financial postings.
For a robot with a suspected actuator fault, the assistant could inspect permitted manuals, compare sourced compatibility claims and prepare a repair request. It should preserve conflicting evidence and route unresolved facts to the maker or named responsible provider. The intended service may book an appointment or arrange a replacement only within the customer’s permission and the provider’s accepted terms. This demonstration performs neither action and establishes no engineering approval.
The same record structure can describe an app’s continuity, a robot’s maintenance, a component’s replacement or an energy-service commitment. The maker must define the actual promise, capacity, terms and cost before it can be represented as an accepted agreement.
If stock is unavailable, show the delay or an independently verified alternative. If a repair is disputed, keep the case open for the responsible provider. A replacement or upgrade needs agreed compatibility, cost, insurance eligibility where applicable, and acceptance evidence; the installed configuration changes only after agreed verification and acceptance. Pending service, disputes and corrections also belong in the history. At exit, explain returns, data export, remaining charges and any obligations that continue.
Track the exact continuing promise, responsible provider, period, measured unit, inclusions and remedy. Qualification, delivered work, customer acceptance and recurring bills stay distinct.
Explore the separate AX-14 fictional order as Me · buyer, We · author and accountable workshop or They · machine. Perspective controls preserve its record within a visit; a new page visit resets the example.
We · value creation · LIQUID · exchange and broader origination direction · SoResFi · instruments and obligations · Network · economic receipt requirements · Aureus · retained gold and other specified programmes
Product design, with local illustrative examples. Live inventory, billing, orders, attribution and payouts are not connected.
Continue exploringNudgeAffiliate links and eligible recurring-sale attribution.Source: Skyzai Markets product model and public explanation and decision map. GitHub repository access may be required. These pages describe the design; they do not adopt commercial terms.
Context: Skyzai XaaS.